CITY OF KANSAS CITY v. CROOK, 469 S.W.3d 871 (2015)
Court: Court of Appeals of Missouri
Number: inadvmoco160205001233
Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 08, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 08, 2015
Summary: ORDER Per Curiam . Following a bench trial, the circuit court awarded a judgment of $272.24 to the City of Kansas City, Missouri ("City") on its claim against Edna Crook and Mary Tallman for unpaid water service bills. The City appeals, contending the circuit court erred in failing to award damages covering the full three-year period of the alleged delinquency. The City also contends the court erred in allowing hearsay testimony and documents proffered by Crook and Tallman. For reasons expla
Summary: ORDER Per Curiam . Following a bench trial, the circuit court awarded a judgment of $272.24 to the City of Kansas City, Missouri ("City") on its claim against Edna Crook and Mary Tallman for unpaid water service bills. The City appeals, contending the circuit court erred in failing to award damages covering the full three-year period of the alleged delinquency. The City also contends the court erred in allowing hearsay testimony and documents proffered by Crook and Tallman. For reasons explai..
More
ORDER
Per Curiam.
Following a bench trial, the circuit court awarded a judgment of $272.24 to the City of Kansas City, Missouri ("City") on its claim against Edna Crook and Mary Tallman for unpaid water service bills. The City appeals, contending the circuit court erred in failing to award damages covering the full three-year period of the alleged delinquency. The City also contends the court erred in allowing hearsay testimony and documents proffered by Crook and Tallman. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment.
AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).
Source: Leagle
